Compare

Sila vs Firecrawl

Firecrawl is the broader product: search, interact, SDKs in four languages, an open-source repo and SOC 2 Type II. Sila is narrower: scrape and crawl with page signals, a flat credit model and sitemap and llms.txt aware crawls.

Facts checked 2026-11-05

Choose Sila when

  • You want page signals (forms, integrations, JSON-LD, category) next to the markdown.
  • You want crawls that read sitemaps and llms-full.txt first and re-crawl only what changed.
  • You prefer 1 credit per static page and 5 per headless page, with failed fetches free.
  • You want a hosted MCP server and CLI that work with OAuth or an API key.

Choose Firecrawl when

  • You need search, interact, parse or monitor endpoints.
  • You want official SDKs for Python, Node, Go or Rust.
  • You want to self-host from the open-source repo, or need SOC 2 Type II.
  • You need volume beyond Sila’s Scale plan: Firecrawl lists plans up to 1,000,000 credits.

Facts side by side

Free plan
Sila500 credits a month
Firecrawl1,000 credits a month
Entry paid plan
SilaPro: $19 a month, 20,000 credits
FirecrawlHobby: $19 a month, 5,000 credits
Largest listed plan
SilaScale: $99 a month, 200,000 credits
FirecrawlScale: $749 a month, 1,000,000 credits
Cost per page
Sila1 credit static, 5 headless
Firecrawl1 credit per basic page; structured JSON adds 4
Failed requests
SilaNot charged
FirecrawlA scrape with no result is free; error-status pages cost 1 credit
Endpoints
Silascrape, crawl, usage
Firecrawlsearch, scrape, crawl, map, parse, interact, monitor
Agent tooling
SilaMCP (OAuth or API key), CLI, skills
FirecrawlMCP, CLI, skills
SDKs
SilaNone; REST API
FirecrawlPython, Node, Go, Rust
Open source and compliance
SilaNo open-source repo; no certification listed
FirecrawlOpen-source repo; SOC 2 Type II

500 free credits every month.

Create a key in under a minute and scrape your first page.

Get API key